The Compliance Time Bomb in Your AI-Generated Code
EU AI Act enforcement hits August 2026. Colorado's AI Act hits June 2026. Most engineering orgs have zero governance for AI-generated code. The audit is coming.
Thinking on software identity, agentic development, and the engineering decisions that persist.
EU AI Act enforcement hits August 2026. Colorado's AI Act hits June 2026. Most engineering orgs have zero governance for AI-generated code. The audit is coming.
Your auditor will ask who wrote the code, against what specification, and how you verified it. Here's how to have answers.
MCP has 97 million monthly SDK downloads and no built-in identity layer. That's a problem.
Your AI agents have credentials, make API calls, and access production data. They're operating on borrowed human identities with no scoped permissions. That's an identity crisis.
96% of organizations report AI costs higher than expected. One agent loop cost $47K over 11 days. The FinOps problem nobody budgeted for.
Every team runs different agents with different configs. Nobody owns the governance. The hidden costs are compounding.
AI models hallucinate package names 20% of the time. Attackers register those names on npm and PyPI. The supply chain attack vector nobody saw coming.
Two-thirds of commercial codebases have license conflicts -- an all-time high. AI strips license information during code generation. The legal exposure is real.
Replit deleted a production database. Amazon's Kiro agent caused a 13-hour outage. Your AI agents have real permissions with no declared boundaries.
We use cookies to understand how you use ribo.dev and improve your experience.
Learn more in our Cookie Policy